|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 21, 2017 10:05:20 GMT
Answer to medieval thomas: agree on the fact that if you already are in a TH you cannot move to be less aligned to the opposing front edge but... when you are not already in TH, I do not see what is preventing you to come to fix 2 opposing TH in advancing forward without not be compliant with the rules???
Answer to Michael : Agree with Stevie and 7b scheme you can choose between 2 TH if you are in so disagree with your point 1 Agree wiith point 2 Agree with point 3 but it is not the question Agree with point 4 but a scheme would be clearer
thank you anyway for your answers, may be other inputs on this tricky case.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 20, 2017 16:14:57 GMT
Since the rules treat this as a different case from lining up, I would say that both is possible: You can either line up, or you can move into or towards contact. is it good for a single element as it is as a group ?
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 20, 2017 15:59:52 GMT
The main issue is a) when you are not contacting the opponent but as you ate in a TH you go nearer him. do you need to line up immediately as soon as you entered in his TH or could you go nearer him without line up ? example I have a line of 3 Bd avancing...The right element entered during this advance into a Psiloi TH which are set in oblique compared to the advancing line. If I apply the a) it means that the right element could not be part anymore of the advancing group as this element should lined up with the oblique opponent ?
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 20, 2017 13:52:18 GMT
I am afraid i will need more détails. a) If I entered only one TH , i have to line-up my front edge element immediately b) I contact the opposing element which created the TH c) I am going straight back my rear d) if multiples TH I could choose
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 20, 2017 9:06:51 GMT
Sure, clear enough, Thx !
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 19, 2017 17:44:11 GMT
Good, one clearky and definitively solved. Thx.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 19, 2017 17:38:51 GMT
Hi guys,
may be the tricy one.
You move 2 single elements which are finishing as a group. the second element is contacting the front corner edge of a single adversary element.
a - Do we consider that the 2 first are a group and so the opposite single element must conforms to the group ? b - Do you consider that the second element move is illegal and that hîs contact could not occur as a group move contact ?
Thanks in advance to your answers.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 19, 2017 17:29:01 GMT
When you will enter in a threat zone, dp you must go straigh forward the element who creates the threat zone as soon as you entered into or must only you go forward this element in the way yoi want ?
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 19, 2017 17:24:22 GMT
Hi guys,
Sorry if tte question seems basic bit we continue to run rules clarifications thru several French so i got several questions and will run several post.
1. Could you move as a group in Rough going even if you are not entirely Psilois ?
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 12, 2017 16:53:14 GMT
Hi Guys, Thank you for the replies. We will play asis. It is just a matter of consistency with most of the players.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 11, 2017 19:06:55 GMT
Hi guys, I posted the question as the subject is closer to the subject
- do any troops allowed to make multiple moves on road ? i mean other than LH, mounted infantry and Ps ? to simplify just assume that trops are entirely on the road !
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Sept 12, 2017 11:32:33 GMT
I agree with Bob that concerning command distance : "An element only partly in GOOD GOING is treated as in the other going. " however as it seems illogical and unrealistic sometimes, i would suggest to apply the same rule as element shooting visibility in bad going, you have to be within 1/2 BW to be able to shoot, if not you could not view anything you could not shoot. If you apply the same rule for command, if you are less than 1/2 BW from the edge of the bad going you applies standard visibility rules 8W , if you are more than 1/2 BW from the edge with the element you apply 4BW. any comment ? we stick teh rule and the logic.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Aug 8, 2017 16:35:06 GMT
Hi all,
We need a clarification about combat/shooting factors of Camp followers :
A camp with no follower (a single tent used as a camp) : factors 2 against foot and 0 against Cavalry
A camp with a figurine nearby ( a tent with a naked woman nearby) : factor 2 + 2 = 4 against foot and 0 + 2= 2 against Cavalry
A camp with an element (foot or cav) : factor 2 + 2 = 4 against foot and 0+ 2= 2 against Cavalry
Thank you for answers.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Jul 29, 2017 10:03:13 GMT
Clear enough ! an errata in the French translation has removed this obligation, now it is conformed as the english rules
ploughs must share another quarter.
thank you.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Jul 27, 2017 18:53:34 GMT
Personally i think that new 3.1 should include all clarifications subjected to questions in 3.0 forum. all armies lists should be updated with justified historical supports. i am not in favor to update combat or shooting factors as if so it change the rule and we all know what happened to rules who did that in past ! if Fast and Solid is a balanced issue, may be you could make pursur Fast with 3 figs and stands Solid with 4 figs ? anyway no change is fine for me !
|
|