|
Post by goldenhord on Oct 23, 2018 10:26:35 GMT
Hi Guys, We had the tricky and would like to know how you solve it ? DBA case 3.pdf (213.84 KB)
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Apr 21, 2018 15:30:43 GMT
thank for the pictures which are nice; The army is not mine, i dunno if he will spliy oxen and carts !
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Apr 21, 2018 9:24:01 GMT
why? the rule DBA 3.0 said WWg could be 80*40 mm for 15 mm figurines...
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Apr 21, 2018 6:55:50 GMT
you are right stupid question it only could be WWG or field Art not both. However the second question remains for WWg (40*80 mm). Agree that for (40*40) the problem does not occurs as the support right and left works but it is not the case for (40*80) which only shoot with a 40mm side part each turn so the support could not be always for a 80 mm side ?
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Apr 20, 2018 15:54:57 GMT
HI ,
I need your point of view for this issue. Hussite Army could have a Warwagon with Artillery. How does you resolve that ? I guess if you shoot, you manage as an Artillery (factor 4,4) ? and in melee as a warwagon (factor 3,4) ? If so results refers accordingly to the combat outcome table ?
Regarding the shooting support, i guess that if 3 WWgs are aligned side by side (3* 8 cm long edge "a la queue leu leu"), only 2 could support themselves for shooting as they have to choose two adjoigning sides (as only one 4cm side could shoot by phase) ?
Thank you for your comments.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Dec 25, 2017 10:43:06 GMT
Ok we will apply the rules asis until further amendments. However what about the move itself on a defender who should aligned ? I thought that only the attacker must aligned not the defender.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Dec 24, 2017 15:49:03 GMT
Well I accept the way you are playing but i still do not undertand why you could leave a TH to catch another ennemy farther and in difficult going that you the contacted element should aligned in front of the coming ennemy.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Dec 24, 2017 12:49:52 GMT
So this is the case and scheme 2 which applies : the blade could avoid the Wb TH and choose to strike the Psiloi. The contacted Psiloi has the choice to fight without alignement so he fights overlapped or as contacted by the blade he may choose to align and fight normally. Do I understand correctly your answer ?
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Dec 23, 2017 21:58:58 GMT
done, sorry do not know how to make it appear easier !
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Dec 23, 2017 12:32:59 GMT
DBA case 2.docx (44.21 KB)Hello Guys,
I Everyboby is in bad going and warband is higher than the Blade, after the Blade is higher the Psiloi Blades is in the 2 TH or ZOC as you like so he may choose : 1- Has the Bd the right to fight Ps instead Warband as it means he left the 1st TH of the Wb? 2. If so, could the Bb contact the Psiloi and force him to align 3 . If the Bd contacts front edge of the Psiloi as he has no place the Psiloi goes backward to let the place for the Blade. have a case for you following the TH (ZOC) issue, what are your point of view as we disagree about the way to solve it ? Attachments:DBA case 2.pdf (188.63 KB)
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 27, 2017 9:22:19 GMT
Thank you Centurion, this is a good summary very clear.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 26, 2017 12:11:35 GMT
Just a precision : Does it means the Psiloi could go backwards of his full move, interpenetrate the friendly troops (ie Cv or Sp) as long as he starts lined-up in front and finishes lined-up behind like in a corridor ! and a Cv could interpenetrate a friendly Psiloi of his full move as long as he starts lined-up behind and finishes lined-up in front like in a corridor !
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 22, 2017 9:46:55 GMT
yes sure we were talking of group in line in rough going. Thx for the clarification.
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 21, 2017 16:59:48 GMT
For us we solved the uphill problem in the following ways : If one is partially outside the hill, you need to get more than half of the front edge on the hill to get the bonus. If both on the hill, we give the bonus to the one which is nearer the central point of the hill. these ways solve crest issue and hill with no crest. It is working without anyone shouting :-)
|
|
|
Post by goldenhord on Nov 21, 2017 12:10:29 GMT
I tried many times to write to Phil and WRG group with the emails given at the end of the book rules... no reply ! Having said that, I used this forum, and guys are very quick to reply and clear and competent with this rules writing. The main point is not for us is to claiming the writing (we are not native English btw !), the reality of the simulation but to play the same rule with teh same understanding. To play right or left is not important as long as everybody is playing in the same way.
|
|