|
Post by stevie on Nov 18, 2017 13:08:17 GMT
The contact and conforming rules in DBA 3.0 can be a bit tricky… …and they have certainly confused me and my friends more than once! You have to meet the requirements of three different rules, without violating any of them:- * Deciding who needs to conform (rule 9.10). * Ending the Move Phase in legal contact (rule 9.9). * And when to turn to face (rule 10.1). So I have made this “Conforming Flowchart” in order to help players navigate their way through the process:- And here is a larger cruder version for those that cannot see the smaller one:- (you may need to widen the the page in order to show the chart correctly) If I make contact, You must be in legal contact when the Move Phase ends, -------no------ do my troops have <----note---- and as enemy contacted in the flank or rear won’t turn to l to conform? face until after the Move Phase, you must conform instead, l l even when a moving group contacts a single element. l yes l l l Do I have enoughl movement to be ------no-----> Then contact can’t happen. l able to conform? Think of something else. l l l yes l l l Trying to conform Then make legal contact as per page 9 paragraph 9. l to the enemy front, -----yes-----> (If not enough space to conform to a flank or rear, l do I have the space? then contact can’t happen) l l l no l l l-------------> Then my opponent ---------------> …so just move into any kind of contact has to conform… and let the enemy worry about conforming! If we can reach a consensus that this is correct, has no flaws, and does not break any rules, then I’ll put the smaller version in the Fanaticus Wiki for players to download and print off.
|
|
|
Post by primuspilus on Nov 18, 2017 15:21:44 GMT
Except, however, that that is the only reference to "movement phase" I could find in the rules...Seems to have been an undefined concept, and it is not clear whether there in fact a PIP phase, a combat phase, a following up phase, and housekeeping phase. This is where the board wargame community rules writing (AH, Decision Games, SPI etc) kind of kicks our collective @$$es...
So in my view the term "immediately after the movement phase" is erroneous, since it is referencing a "non-declared variable", i.e. the "phase". At should say "Upon conclusion of tactical moves..."
There is a series of steps outlined to execute a bound, however some of these (such as dicing for PIPs) would surely not meet the commonly-accepted definition of a "phase" in wargaming. I remain sceptical of Stevie's flowchart as written.
Now since I am reading it as "upon conclusion of tactical moves", it is far less obvious that groups hitting a lone element on part of a flank need to conform (and conforming, to me, means "adjust the element(s) so that edge to edge contact is one of the types defined in the rules as being needed to resolve combat - flank, front or otherwise"). Rather, in Stevie's original diagram, the Aux hit the Pike partially on the flank, and as long as there is no one in frontal contact with the Pike at the conclusion of movement, the Pike slides over and conforms.
|
|
|
Post by Simon on Nov 18, 2017 17:54:17 GMT
Are we in danger of over-intellectualising this? I have been playing DBA 3 for about three years (and played no earlier versions before that). Over the last couple of years, I have organised five tournaments with an average of about 14 players playing 6 rounds - so around 210 games played. There was the very occasional request for a rules ruling, but not many. Players threw dice, moved their toy soldiers around and enjoyed a game that generally gave a historically credible result. Were rules occasionally incorrectly interpreted? Probably. Did it really matter? Probably not. I guess this can be multiplied many times in other tournaments and even more so by social games.
I do worry that if some-one new to DBA landed on this forum, they would be led to think that DBA is an impassible semantic minefield rather than the quick-play and abstract but challenging, engaging and mainly historically credible game that it is in practice.
Cheers
Simon
|
|
|
Post by stevie on Nov 18, 2017 17:59:11 GMT
So in my view the term "immediately after the movement phase" is erroneous, since it is referencing a "non-declared variable", i.e. the "phase". It should say "Upon conclusion of tactical moves..." Yeah…well…it doesn’t. However, what page 10 paragraph 1 actually says is:- “Immediately after the movement phase, elements contacted to the flank or rear by an enemy front-edge turn to face…” So rule 9.10 says an enemy just touching (i.e. contacting) a flank causes a wait before turning… But rule 10.1 says an enemy front-edge touching (i.e. contacting) a flank causes a wait before turning… That’s where the error lies…rule 9.10 is missing the words ‘front-edge’, and should say:- “Unless turning to face a flank or rear front-edge contact (see p.10), contacted elements conform on contact.” Either that or the first part of this sentence is not actually a rule, but merely an instruction to look elsewhere for details. Think we have finally sussed it primuspilus. So here is an amended version of my beautiful “Conforming Flowchart”:- If I make contact, Conforming troops line-up on contact, but those with -------no------ do my troops have <----note---- an enemy front-edge in contact with a flank or rear l to conform? wait until the end of the Move Phase to turn and face. l l l yes l l l Do I have enoughl movement to be ------no-----> Then contact can’t happen. l able to conform? Think of something else. l l l yes l l l Trying to conform Then make legal contact as per page 9 paragraph 9. l to the enemy front, -----yes-----> (If not enough space to conform to a flank or rear, l do I have the space? then contact can’t happen) l l l no l l l-------------> Then my opponent ---------------> …so just move into any kind of contact has to conform… and let the enemy worry about conforming! How does that sound?
|
|
|
Post by stevie on Nov 18, 2017 18:14:02 GMT
Simon,
If the rules were clear, people wouldn’t need to ask questions. And it is nice to play the same way as everybody else and interpret the rules as they were intended. Anyway, if my “Conforming Flowchart” is finally correct, there should be less questions in the future.
|
|
|
Post by medievalthomas on Nov 20, 2017 19:59:56 GMT
There is a rule conflict and no way to tell which takes priority. Either the Aux counts as a side contact and therefore must conform using its MA at contact OR it counts as a group contacting a single element and therefore the single element must conform (for free).
If the first concept takes priority:
The Aux conforms on contact - as a side contact it has to have enough MA to make the wheel/pivot into contact - if it can't the move is illegal.
If the Aux can conform and no one contacts the enemy front edge, it conforms at the end of Movement Phase.
If the Blade contacts the front then the opposing element does not turn to conform to the Aux. It makes no different what the order of contacts were as you don't conform to a side contact until the end of movement and then only if you have not been contacted to the front.
If the second concept controls then the opponent conforms to the Aux and the Blade can make a side contact and (if it has enough MA) conform. It would depend on the order of contact.
The first and last sentence of the 2nd para of MOVING INTO CONTACT WITH ENEMY, in this case, contradict each other. Umps will have to make a choice. I'm contemplating which one I would recommend. I'm leaning to making the single element conform to a group even if a side contact. Another rule area that needs clarification.
TomT
|
|
|
Post by stevie on Nov 21, 2017 14:06:20 GMT
Sorry if I seem like I am picking the rules apart, but I and my little group of friends do not have the luxury of having an experienced DBA player on hand to lead us through all the intricate complexities of DBA 3.0. All we have as a guide are the rules as they are written, and trying to follow the “Moving Into Contact” rules word-for-word brings up the following contradictions:- Rule 9.9 says the contacting (i.e. moving) troops must conform and line-up by the end of the Move Phase… But rule 9.10 says the contacted (i.e. stationary) elements must conform and line-up on contact… And rule 9.10 says an enemy just contacting (i.e. touching) a flank causes a wait before turning… But rule 10.1 says an enemy front-edge contacting (i.e. touching) a flank causes a wait before turning… However, this thread has revealed a consensus of sorts in that Bob, Simon, Twrnz, Martin, and others are all pretty certain that a single stationary element conforms on contact to a moving group. And now that I have convinced myself that the words “Unless turning to face a flank or rear contact (see p.10)” is not actually a rule but just an instruction to seek elsewhere for more information, I at last begin to understand their point of view. Therefore I won’t be adding my Conforming Flowchart to the Fanaticus Wiki, as it is not my place to decide on the correct interpretation of “Moving Into Contact” rules, and I don’t want to spread information that may be incorrect. I’m afraid each player and umpire will just have to decide on their own interpretation. But until there is an ‘official’ ruling on this matter, I and my friends will be using that flowchart, on the assumption that the following is correct:- Conforming troops line-up on contact, but those with an enemy front-edge in contact with a flank or rear wait until the end of the Move Phase to turn and face, unless already engaged to their front. Some potentially useful player aids can be found here, including the latest June 2017 FAQ and the Quick Reference Sheets from the Society of Ancients:- fanaticus-dba.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Reference_sheets_and_epitomes
|
|
|
Post by primuspilus on Nov 21, 2017 16:25:37 GMT
Hi Stevie.
One thing I noted that often causes confusion with the newer players I have taught the game to, is the difference between "turning to face" and conforming. Turning to face a legal flank contact is not conforming. The contact was already legal! Conforming can sometimes involve moving from a state of illegal contact (i.e. off-angle, or offset) to a state of legal (front point to front point, edge to edge, or whatever, etc...) contact. If that legal state happens to be a flank contact, and no frontal contact has been made, the contacted element gets to "convert" a flank contact into a frontal one - i.e the troops are not prevented from rearranging ranks to meet the incoming threat.
Once I gave this explanation, it seemed pretty clear for most of the new guys...
|
|