|
|
Post by Dangun on Apr 10, 2017 5:26:01 GMT
With any luck, in an upcoming issue of Slingshot, they'll be an article on Koguryo and a possible revision of the DBA 3.0 army list. Hope you like it. SOA's Slingshot |
|
|
|
Post by paulhannah on Apr 12, 2017 16:56:34 GMT
Okay, your tease about new info on the Koguryo Koreans has piqued my interest. I have that army, and recently renovated it for V-3. Any more info on what might be in the Slingshot article?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony Aguilar on Apr 12, 2017 18:53:56 GMT
This would be a revision to the revised 3.0 version.
I still have the antiquated 2.2 version of this army and I have enjoyed playing them very much.
I will hold off on revising my army, based the fact that the lists changed so dramatically and that the Alain Touller figures I have might not represent the correct time period for Koguryo correctly.
Khurasan came out with some pretty cool "more accurate" figures recently, but I think I will resist the urge as I have so much to paint right now without buying any more figures.
|
|
|
|
Post by pawsbill on Apr 13, 2017 19:59:21 GMT
This would be a revision to the revised 3.0 version. I still have the antiquated 2.2 version of this army and I have enjoyed playing them very much. I will hold off on revising my army, based the fact that the lists changed so dramatically and that the Alain Touller figures I have might not represent the correct time period for Koguryo correctly. Khurasan came out with some pretty cool "more accurate" figures recently, but I think I will resist the urge as I have so much to paint right now without buying any more figures. The AT figures cataphracts and LH (and possibly the unarmoured archers) are fine but the heavy foot is Mongol Conquest period.
I like the Khurasan range but they have used their Tang armoured horse which doesn't look right. The AT cataphract horse has th right armour type and the conical "banner" on the horse's rump.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dangun on Jun 19, 2017 11:50:27 GMT
Coming soon in Slingshot 312 May/June 2017
|
|
