|
Post by dpd on Aug 1, 2023 13:30:59 GMT
IMHO DBA/M is lacking a unique unit, the mounted equivalent of a warband: barbarian cavalry.
Lightly/moderately armored, and armed with both lance and javelin - lighter than cavalry but heavier than horse archers - barbarian horse could operate in bad going (Germanic forests, Irish bogs, North African mountains). They were the primary cavalry of the Gauls, Irish, Germans, Goths, Moors, Numidians, etc. They also made up the bulk of the Roman mounted auxiliaries of the late republic and early empire.
It's a unique unit with its own combat style and movement capabilities, practicing ambush and hit-n-run tactics in bad going using both missile and shock action.
As light camelry (2cm) is associated with light horse (2lh), this unit should be associated with heavy camelry (3cm) - which is also a major mounted component of desert based barbarian tribes.
Heavy chariots (hch) remain associated with knights (knt), and light chariots (lch) remain associated with cavalry (cav).
Light horse would then would be exclusively horse archers.
Thoughts or comments?
|
|
|
Post by vodnik on Aug 1, 2023 13:57:42 GMT
...no comments...
|
|
|
Post by stevie on Aug 1, 2023 14:07:13 GMT
Hmmm…Light Horse (armed with javelins) don’t like getting in close combat… …unless the enemy has already been disrupted by missiles, and they don’t pursue.
The mounted equivalent to Warbands in DBA are Knights… …with a similar set of ‘quick kills’, and they will pursue.
|
|
|
Post by Les1964 on Aug 1, 2023 14:18:46 GMT
Write your own set of rules and come back in 20 years , to let us know how they are doing .
|
|
|
Post by dpd on Aug 1, 2023 14:30:42 GMT
As units relying on shock action, I would think that knights are mounted equivalents of spear and pike.
Perhaps the most obvious characteristic of barbarian cavalry would be its ability to move quickly through bad going.
That and barbarian cavalry would (unlike light horse) want to get involved in close combat.
|
|