|
Post by dpd on Jun 12, 2023 21:30:52 GMT
Would like to go cheap on DBA (and other table top ancient/medieval miniatures war games) by using good old fashioned cardboard counters like in a typical hex-and-counter board games. However, most ancient/medieval units when so designated are usually displayed with painted figures or silhouettes. So why not develop NATO style symbols inside neat rectangles ("x" in for infantry, "slash" for cavalry, "oval" for tank, black triangle for mountain units, black circle for artillery, combinations like x and oval for mechanized infantry, etc.) but for ancient unit types. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_Joint_Military_Symbology(Scroll down to modified military symbology quick guide) upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/99/Military_Symbology_Guide.svgDBA has essentially 16 unit types covering all categories of ancient/medieval units: 8 infantry (spear, pike, blade, warband. auxilia, horde, psiloi and bow) - all of which would use a NATO "x-in-a-rectangle" augmented by a descriptor symbol 3 horse mounted (knight, cavalry light horse) - all of which would use a NATO "slash-in-a-rectangle" augmented by a descriptor symbol 3 other mounted (elephant, scythed chariot, camel) - all of which would use a NATO "oval-in-a-rectangle" augmented by a descriptor symbol 2 train units (war wagon, artillery) - all of which would use a NATO "dark circle-in-a-rectangle" augmented by a descriptor symbol. For example: War wagons would use the NATO "dark circle-in-a-rectangle" augmented by a wheel vehicle symbol Camelry would use the NATO "oval-in-a-rectangle" augmented by a slash symbol Warbands would use the NATO "x-in-a-rectangle" augmented by a dark triangle mountain symbol etc. Thoughts or comments?
|
|
|
Post by hammurabi70 on Jun 13, 2023 7:51:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jim1973 on Jun 13, 2023 7:56:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by menacussecundus on Jun 13, 2023 9:33:40 GMT
My late father used to remark occasionally that the army had the ability to take the simplest concept and reduce it to its most complicated form.
Nothing wrong with the basic idea, but a supply of MDF bases and 4 different colour marker pens (to allow for allies) is surely a cheaper option? Write in the troop type so it can be read by both players, add an arrow or triangle to denote the front edge and away you go. (It also eradicates the heresy of putting sold foot on deeper bases.)
But, as someone who is currently a third of the way through painting a Later Amorite army, it's not for me.
|
|
|
Post by martin on Jun 13, 2023 12:28:46 GMT
My late father used to remark occasionally that the army had the ability to take the simplest concept and reduce it to its most complicated form. Nothing wrong with the basic idea, but a supply of MDF bases and 4 different colour marker pens (to allow for allies) is surely a cheaper option? Write in the troop type so it can be read by both players, add an arrow or triangle to denote the front edge and away you go. (It also eradicates the heresy of putting sold foot on deeper bases.) But, as someone who is currently a third of the way through painting a Later Amorite army, it's not for me. Top third, middle third or bottom third, Denis? 🙃 Martin the Heretic
|
|