|
Post by txwargamer on Sept 10, 2016 2:24:43 GMT
Thanks for the links to the great sources.
|
|
|
D3H2
Sept 9, 2016 23:50:57 GMT
Post by txwargamer on Sept 9, 2016 23:50:57 GMT
I would greatly appreciate a copy too. My email is jhovey11@yahoo.com.
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Sept 9, 2016 23:49:23 GMT
We are looking for the date of our Tornado Alley event. If you are interested please PM me or post.
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Sept 9, 2016 23:48:32 GMT
I'm interested in D3H2, is there a pdf?
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Sept 9, 2016 23:44:39 GMT
Thanks for standing watch!
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Sept 4, 2016 4:16:52 GMT
Great looking games. I'm headed over yo follow you on Twitter too.
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Sept 4, 2016 4:14:39 GMT
Have you considered the DBA HX 3.0 conversion? The War of 1812 lists are covered and we had great fun playing them. Just a thought.
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Sept 1, 2016 0:37:37 GMT
I love these questions and analysis that is put forth. Just like evaluating chess positions.
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Aug 28, 2016 21:40:28 GMT
Thanks Joe
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Aug 28, 2016 21:39:14 GMT
Hi,
I'd love to test it.
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Aug 28, 2016 3:17:24 GMT
I really like it and it would help me reboot the North Texas scene.
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Aug 27, 2016 23:35:01 GMT
I am currently using Horse Foot & Guns, (The DBA analog from WRG) for War of the Spanish Succession (in 6mm on 60mm x 30mm bases), and it works very well. It extends to cover ACW as well, and the 'feel' for large scale games is excellent. If you haven't tried it, I believe they are available as a free download, and as a lulu printed copy.. In HFG, about how many bases make up an army? I'm debating HX, DBACW, or HFG for my ACW games. Heck perhaps using the HX 3.0 might work well. It only goes to 1850 but should be easily extended.
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Aug 27, 2016 23:31:31 GMT
Truly inspired work!
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Aug 27, 2016 14:46:07 GMT
Tony has quoted the exact rule, and highlighted the phrase, "has also lost more such elements than the enemy." How can anyone possibly think that it's over at a 4 - 4 tie. At that point neither side has lost more! After that it's not quite sudden death in that the first player to lose an element beyond four loses the game. Complete bounds are still played, not stopped at the first loss, during the bound. At the end of a bound the losses are counted, and a player who has lost four and more than his opponent, loses. It's possible during a bound after both have lost four, that one player loses another element, and then the other player loses another element, so at the end of the bound neither player has lost more. Then play another bound.. Thanks Bob and the way you stated it is actually how we play.
|
|
|
Post by txwargamer on Aug 26, 2016 20:09:08 GMT
We always continue to the golden goal.
|
|