|
|
Post by jim1973 on Mar 6, 2024 11:35:00 GMT
I've already stated that I don't like this rule and I was wondering if anyone has had any success with house rules to modify the way this works.
Cheers
Jim
|
|
|
|
Post by skb777 on Mar 6, 2024 15:09:40 GMT
I can't understand how they always turn up on time, no one gets lost or sinks - there is no double jeopardy involved what-so-ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by claudermilk on Mar 6, 2024 15:10:42 GMT
I'll be interested to read about any. I may be a noob to DBA, but I've already learned to heed Admiral Ackbar on this one: "it's a trap!" Every time I've tried a landing it's been a disaster for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by martin on Mar 6, 2024 18:38:56 GMT
Every time I've tried a landing it's been a disaster for me. It’s certainly a two-edged sword, the littoral landing 🙃. |
|
|
|
Post by Peter Feinler on Mar 7, 2024 1:25:07 GMT
One option would be to add a chance element so that a littoral landing wouldn't be a certainty.
In my best imitation Barkerese, the existing rule could be changed to start with:
"If a waterway has been placed, either side whose last raw* deployment dice score was an odd number can reserve 2-3 elements (whose army's home terrain is LITTORAL)..."
*ie, the dice score before adding the aggression factor.
Peter
|
|
|
|
Post by jim1973 on Mar 7, 2024 1:30:44 GMT
I can't understand how they always turn up on time, no one gets lost or sinks - there is no double jeopardy involved what-so-ever. Given how easy it seems, I'm surprised we don't read about it more often in the historical records. 😉 Jim |
|
|
|
Post by mark leslie on Mar 7, 2024 3:19:30 GMT
I can't understand how they always turn up on time, no one gets lost or sinks - there is no double jeopardy involved what-so-ever. Given how easy it seems, I'm surprised we don't read about it more often in the historical records. 😉 Jim Fortunately, Peter Jackson helps us all envision what an historical beach landing may have looked like. |
|
