Recent Posts

My turn to say “Ha!”...

...if the commander of a hoplite army does everything possible wrong, and lets a lone Spear element
without side-support be attacked by a lone Psiloi (CF 3 v CF 2), then I think they deserve to have the
very occasional ‘once-in-a-blue-moon’ 1 chance in 36 disaster.
But when they do things right (CF 3 +1 for side-support v CF 2) it’ll never happen...unless overlapped.

Remembering of course that Hordes are the only foot that ever pursue Psiloi, so even Blades with
the new combat factor of 4 will never pursue Psiloi into a double-overlap position (a CF of 4 v CF 2
has zero chance of being doubled...and with one overlap so it’s CF 3 v CF 2 there is only 1 in 36 chance).

Oh I think that quibbling over ‘1-in-36’ as opposed to ‘none-in-36’ is pretty superficial.
1 in 36 IS practically none...it’s once in a blue moon, at the very extremity of good/bad luck,
and you’d have to play lots and lots of Ps v HI before you ever see it happen.
        CF 2 v CF 5 = no chance of the CF 5 being doubled (zero%).
        CF 2 v CF 4 = no chance of the CF 4 being doubled (zero%).
        CF 2 v CF 3 = 1 chance in 36 of the CF 3 being doubled (2.8%).
        CF 2 v CF 2 = 4 chances in 36 of the CF 2 being doubled (11%).
        CF 2 v CF 1 = 9 chances in 36 of the CF 1 being doubled (25%).

Small for a DBA battle, but a single element perhaps! So perhaps in a 1on1 matchup, Ps SHOULD have a 1/36 (tiny) chance of killing them

And from a game point of view, it would also help solve the situation in DBA where heavy foot only has 7 BW of space to deploy
some 10 or 12 Spear elements...leading to some Spears being left behind in reserve as if it 
were a Roman and not that of an historical Greek formation.

"only +1 if there is an ‘r’ in the month, but not before 11:00 am, unless it's a Tuesday, except during a leap year"

I have two answers to that Jim me laddie.

    1) Bows have a range of 3 BW, so can deal death at a distance (indeed, this is exactly what
        happened at Agincourt...both sides sat for hours looking at each other until Henry V told
        his men to up-stakes and advance into bowshot. The French then had three choices...
       ...withdraw and lose face, attack the English, or stand there and get shot to pieces).

    2) I’d change the aggression factors, so the English have an aggression of 2 while the French
        have an aggression of 3 (after all, it was the English that mostly chose the field of battle,
        not the French. And if using the “Sun Clock” or the “Time of Day Display”, it will be up to
        the French to make rash attacks, like they did at Crecy, Poitiers and Agincourt (are three
        historical examples not enough?) or the defending English will be the winners by nightfall.
        As Phil Barker himself says on page 14: “A drawn battle counts as a win to the defender,
        since he loses no territory”).

Regarding that second item above, I’d also change the II/32a Later Carthaginian aggression to 2.
Again it was clever old Hannibal that chose the fields of battle, not the Romans, leading to the rash
Roman attacks at the River Trebia in 216 BC, at Lake Trasimene in 217 BC, and of course at Cannae
In 218 BC (are three historical examples not enough?).
How’s that for a bit more realism (I do like simple solutions that fix multiple problems).

The way the army lists have it, it’s the French and the Romans that usually get to place the terrain...
...so much for historical accuracy.

Oh, and just because the French are the ‘attackers’, that does not mean they have invaded England.
It just means the French have invaded English held territory in France (and the English owned at lot of it).
Likewise, just because the Romans are the ‘attackers’, that does not mean they have invaded Africa.
It just means they are invading a lost province in Italy (and it didn’t take Hannibal long to own much of it.).