|
|
Post by stevie on Sept 12, 2019 6:45:08 GMT
To be clear, the gist of the discussion seems no longer "what do the rules say?" but rather "what SHOULD the rules say" about rivers. That’s a very good point Primuspilus. But since the rules do not tell us what effect rivers have on combat (apart from the riverbank bonus, and that “For movement” they are neither good nor other going), we players are left in limbo. Thus we have no choice but to try and patch the gap in the river rules in our own way... ....either by making them unplayable (so they are rarely if ever used) or by making them playable (and we get to see them more often on our wargames table). This river rule ‘gap’ needs to be filled, one way or the other. |
|
|
|
Post by jim1973 on Sept 12, 2019 12:38:21 GMT
To be clear, the gist of the discussion seems no longer "what do the rules say?" but rather "what SHOULD the rules say" about rivers. Absolutely correct, at least on this thread. I started this thread so those of us that think that the River rules need a change can discuss (and maybe even agree?) on a solution. I am hopeful (but not optimistic) that the FAQ team will solve this problem. But it couldn't hurt to have an alternative to consider. Cheers Jim |
|
