Post by j on Apr 1, 2019 18:23:52 GMT
I have 10 x 2.2 armies (all options) I will be upgrading, LAP; Polybian Romans; Campanians; Later Carthaginians; Numidians; Gallic; Ancient Spanish; Skythian; Later Hoplite Greek; Syracusan. My oppo has Alexandrian Macedonian & Imperial; Thracian; Parthian. They are all capable of historical encounters.
Which match up do you think would be the closest run thing? Which, if any, would be a bit one-sided?
Last night LAP beat Alexandrian Macedonians quite easily while Polybian Romans snatched defeat from the jaws of victory vs Later Carthaginians (sans El) Likely more to do with the playing styles & temperaments of the players as we only recently returned to DBA after a couple of years away & these were our first 2 games trying to come to grips with 3.0
We are trying to come at the rules as if they were completely new but it's hard to shake off half rememberd stuff from 2.2 & even HotT which we had played for 10 years or more.
Regards,
j
Which match up do you think would be the closest run thing? Which, if any, would be a bit one-sided?
Last night LAP beat Alexandrian Macedonians quite easily while Polybian Romans snatched defeat from the jaws of victory vs Later Carthaginians (sans El) Likely more to do with the playing styles & temperaments of the players as we only recently returned to DBA after a couple of years away & these were our first 2 games trying to come to grips with 3.0
We are trying to come at the rules as if they were completely new but it's hard to shake off half rememberd stuff from 2.2 & even HotT which we had played for 10 years or more.
Regards,
j
